Understand what CO-175 denials mean and how they impact healthcare revenue cycle teams. Explore how to appeal such denials and prevent them from occurring.
One of the most frustrating denial codes revenue cycle management (RCM) teams encounter is CO-175, which indicates an incomplete prescription. These denials can interrupt cash flow, increase operational burdens, and erode payer-provider relationships. Understanding this denial code is essential for healthcare organizations seeking to maintain efficiency and reduce revenue leakage.
In this article, we’ll explore what CO-175 denials mean, why they occur, and how RCM professionals can effectively appeal and prevent them. With proper strategies and technology, such as CombineHealth.ai’s tools like Adam and Rachel, organizations can stay ahead of denial challenges.
CO-175 is a contractual obligation denial code used by payers to inform providers that the submitted prescription lacks required information or elements. This typically occurs when details like dosage instructions, physician credentials, or patient identifiers are incomplete or missing.
The prefix “CO” denotes that the payer considers the denial the provider’s responsibility due to submission errors. This means the financial burden of rework falls on the provider rather than the patient or payer. Providers must address such denials promptly to recover lost revenue and avoid write-offs.
| Denial Code | Prefix Meaning | Reason/Description | Who's Financially Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO-175 | Contractual Obligation | Prescription is incomplete. | Provider |
| CO-16 | Contractual Obligation | Claim lacks information or required fields. | Provider |
| CO-167 | Contractual Obligation | Diagnosis code missing or invalid. | Provider |
While CO-175 focuses specifically on incomplete prescriptions, other codes like CO-16 or CO-167 relate to missing or incorrect claim data, such as diagnosis codes. The primary similarity is the responsibility, which remains with the provider for ensuring accurate and complete submissions.
CO-175 denials pose both financial and operational challenges for RCM teams:
Financial Impact:
- Revenue Loss: Rejected claims delay reimbursements and strain cash flow.
- Increased Accounts Receivable (AR) Days: Prolonged resolution timelines extend AR cycles.
- Write-Off Risk: Unresolved denials may result in losses if appeals fail or deadlines are missed.
- Operational Cost Burden: Additional staff hours are required for denial management, reducing overall efficiency.
Operational Impact:
- Disrupted Workflow: Teams must divert resources from other priority functions to handle denials.
- Documentation Complexity: Payers often require detailed clinical records to resolve CO-175 denials.
- Cross-Department Coordination: Successful resolution requires collaboration across billing, coding, and clinical teams.
- Denial Tracking Challenges: Identifying patterns and managing appeal outcomes demand specialized tools and expertise.
Leveraging AI-powered solutions like CombineHealth.ai’s Adam can help RCM teams automate denial identification, optimize workflows, and better manage appeals. Combined with Rachel’s streamlined appeals process, healthcare organizations can reduce operational strain while improving cash flow.
Step 1: Review the Denial Notice
Carefully examine the payer’s explanation of the denial to determine what prescription information is missing.
Step 2: Gather Documentation
Collect all required prescription details, including physician credentials, patient identifiers, and dosage specifications.
Step 3: Verify Eligibility
Confirm patient coverage and ensure all details align with the payer’s documentation requirements.
Step 4: Prepare Appeal Letter
Draft a professional appeal letter, including the corrected prescription information, supporting documentation, and references to payer guidelines.
Step 5: Submit Within Deadline
Ensure the appeal is submitted within the payer’s specified timeframe to avoid forfeiting reimbursement opportunities.
Step 6: Track and Follow Up
Monitor the status of the appeal and maintain communication with the payer to expedite resolution.
Proactive measures are key to minimizing CO-175 denials:
By leveraging advanced technology like CombineHealth.ai’s solutions, healthcare organizations can prevent denials, reduce manual workloads, and ensure faster reimbursements.
Q1: What does CO-175 mean in medical billing?
CO-175 indicates a denial due to an incomplete prescription, where required details are missing.
Q2: Can CO-175 denials be appealed?
Yes, providers can appeal CO-175 denials by correcting the missing information and submitting the necessary documentation.
Q3: How long do I have to appeal?
Payers typically provide a specific timeframe for appeals, often ranging from 30-90 days. Check the denial notice for deadlines.
Q4: How can I prevent these denials?
Implement quality checks, staff training, and automated tools like CombineHealth.ai’s Adam to catch errors before submission. See our complete guide on denial prevention.