CO-228

Understand what CO-228 denials mean and how they impact healthcare revenue cycle teams. Explore how to appeal such denials and prevent them from occurring.

CO-228 Denials Explained: How to Identify, Appeal, and Prevent Them

Healthcare revenue cycle management (RCM) teams often face frustrating challenges with CO-228 denial codes. These denials occur when required information isn’t supplied to the primary or previous payer, delaying claim adjudication and impacting cash flow. Understanding the nuances of CO-228 denials is crucial for identifying their root causes and implementing solutions to minimize their occurrence.

This article provides a comprehensive guide to CO-228 denials, including how to identify them, appeal successfully, and prevent future issues. By the end, RCM professionals will have actionable strategies to protect their organization’s revenue and optimize operations.

What Is a CO-228 Denial?

A CO-228 denial is issued when a claim is denied due to the failure of the provider, another provider, or the subscriber to submit requested information to a previous payer for proper adjudication. The "CO" prefix stands for "Contractual Obligation," meaning the denial stems from requirements outlined by the payer agreement. In such cases, the financial responsibility typically falls on the provider or payer, not the patient.

This denial code signals that critical data needed to process the claim—for example, eligibility or coordination of benefits details—was absent or incomplete.

Comparison: CO-228 vs Similar Denial Codes

Denial Code Prefix Meaning Reason/Description Who's Financially Responsible
CO-228 Contractual Obligation Denied for failure to provide requested information to a previous payer Provider/Payer
CO-29 Contractual Obligation Denied because the claim was submitted late Provider
CO-16 Contractual Obligation Denied due to missing information required for processing Provider

While CO-228 and similar codes, such as CO-29 and CO-16, stem from missing or incomplete information, CO-228 specifically relates to prior payer adjudication. The responsibility typically lies with the provider or payer, unlike other codes where the issue may involve patient responsibility.

Common Causes of CO-228 Denials

  1. Incomplete Documentation: Failure to include supporting documents requested by the primary payer, such as medical records or coordination of benefits forms.
  2. Errors in Coordination of Benefits (COB): Missing or incorrect COB details can delay adjudication by the primary payer, resulting in denials.
  3. Eligibility Verification Issues: Incorrect or outdated subscriber information prevents proper claim processing by the previous payer.
  4. Failure to Respond to Payer Requests: Delays or non-responses to follow-up inquiries from the primary payer often result in CO-228 denials.

Impact on Revenue Cycle Teams

CO-228 denials place considerable strain on healthcare RCM teams, affecting both financial performance and operational efficiency.

Financial Impact:
- Revenue loss due to delayed or denied payments.
- Increased accounts receivable days, reducing cash flow and financial stability.
- Write-offs from appeals that exceed payer deadlines or requirements.
- Higher administrative costs to manage denial rework and appeals.

Operational Impact:
- Time-consuming denial management processes divert staff attention from core activities.
- Increased demands for payer-specific expertise, coordination, and documentation reviews.
- Collaboration challenges between billing, coding, and clinical teams to address information gaps.
- Heightened need for tracking and reporting tools to monitor denial trends and appeal success rates.

To mitigate these challenges, RCM teams can leverage CombineHealth.ai's AI-powered solutions, such as Adam (AI Denial Manager), to streamline denial resolution workflows, reduce revenue leakage, and improve cash flow.

Steps To Appeal a CO-228 Denial

Follow these steps to successfully appeal a CO-228 denial:

Step 1: Review the Denial Notice
Carefully examine the explanation of benefits (EOB) or denial notice to understand the exact reason for the denial and identify missing information.

Step 2: Gather Documentation
Compile all necessary documents requested by the primary payer, including COB details, medical records, and eligibility information.

Step 3: Verify Eligibility
Ensure subscriber details, COB information, and other payer-specific requirements are accurate and up to date.

Step 4: Prepare Appeal Letter
Draft a professional, concise appeal letter outlining the denial reason, corrective actions taken, and supporting documentation.

Step 5: Submit Within Deadline
Adhere to the payer’s appeal timeline to avoid forfeiting the opportunity for reconsideration.

Step 6: Track and Follow Up
Monitor the appeal’s progress and follow up with the payer for updates. Use denial management tools like Adam to automate tracking and reporting.

How To Prevent CO-228 Denials

Preventing CO-228 denials requires a proactive approach across the revenue cycle, from front-end processes to billing and technology implementation.

Front-End Prevention

  • Focus on Eligibility Verification: Ensure subscriber information and COB details are accurate during patient registration.
  • Respond Promptly to Payer Requests: Establish workflows to address payer inquiries for documentation in a timely manner.

Billing Best Practices

  • Thorough Documentation Submission: Include all payer-required documents with initial claims to minimize missing information.
  • Claim Compliance Reviews: Conduct audits to ensure claims meet payer-specific adjudication requirements.

Technology Solutions

  • Automated Eligibility Checks: Use CombineHealth.ai’s platform to verify subscriber data and COB information in real time.
  • Advanced Claim Scrubbing: Adam identifies missing or inaccurate claim details before submission, reducing denial risks.

When denials do occur, Rachel (AI Appeals Manager) streamlines the appeals process, improving success rates and reducing turnaround time for appealed claims.

FAQs

Q1: What does CO-228 mean in medical billing?
CO-228 refers to claims denied due to missing information requested by the primary payer for adjudication.

Q2: Can CO-228 denials be appealed?
Yes, with proper documentation and adherence to payer timelines, CO-228 denials can be successfully appealed.

Q3: How long do I have to appeal?
Appeal deadlines vary by payer. Review the explanation of benefits (EOB) or denial notice for specific timelines.

Q4: How can I prevent these denials?
Focus on eligibility verification, COB accuracy, and leveraging automated tools like Adam. See our complete guide on denial prevention.