Understand what CO-228 denials mean and how they impact healthcare revenue cycle teams. Explore how to appeal such denials and prevent them from occurring.
Healthcare revenue cycle management (RCM) teams often face frustrating challenges with CO-228 denial codes. These denials occur when required information isn’t supplied to the primary or previous payer, delaying claim adjudication and impacting cash flow. Understanding the nuances of CO-228 denials is crucial for identifying their root causes and implementing solutions to minimize their occurrence.
This article provides a comprehensive guide to CO-228 denials, including how to identify them, appeal successfully, and prevent future issues. By the end, RCM professionals will have actionable strategies to protect their organization’s revenue and optimize operations.
A CO-228 denial is issued when a claim is denied due to the failure of the provider, another provider, or the subscriber to submit requested information to a previous payer for proper adjudication. The "CO" prefix stands for "Contractual Obligation," meaning the denial stems from requirements outlined by the payer agreement. In such cases, the financial responsibility typically falls on the provider or payer, not the patient.
This denial code signals that critical data needed to process the claim—for example, eligibility or coordination of benefits details—was absent or incomplete.
| Denial Code | Prefix Meaning | Reason/Description | Who's Financially Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO-228 | Contractual Obligation | Denied for failure to provide requested information to a previous payer | Provider/Payer |
| CO-29 | Contractual Obligation | Denied because the claim was submitted late | Provider |
| CO-16 | Contractual Obligation | Denied due to missing information required for processing | Provider |
While CO-228 and similar codes, such as CO-29 and CO-16, stem from missing or incomplete information, CO-228 specifically relates to prior payer adjudication. The responsibility typically lies with the provider or payer, unlike other codes where the issue may involve patient responsibility.
CO-228 denials place considerable strain on healthcare RCM teams, affecting both financial performance and operational efficiency.
Financial Impact:
- Revenue loss due to delayed or denied payments.
- Increased accounts receivable days, reducing cash flow and financial stability.
- Write-offs from appeals that exceed payer deadlines or requirements.
- Higher administrative costs to manage denial rework and appeals.
Operational Impact:
- Time-consuming denial management processes divert staff attention from core activities.
- Increased demands for payer-specific expertise, coordination, and documentation reviews.
- Collaboration challenges between billing, coding, and clinical teams to address information gaps.
- Heightened need for tracking and reporting tools to monitor denial trends and appeal success rates.
To mitigate these challenges, RCM teams can leverage CombineHealth.ai's AI-powered solutions, such as Adam (AI Denial Manager), to streamline denial resolution workflows, reduce revenue leakage, and improve cash flow.
Follow these steps to successfully appeal a CO-228 denial:
Step 1: Review the Denial Notice
Carefully examine the explanation of benefits (EOB) or denial notice to understand the exact reason for the denial and identify missing information.
Step 2: Gather Documentation
Compile all necessary documents requested by the primary payer, including COB details, medical records, and eligibility information.
Step 3: Verify Eligibility
Ensure subscriber details, COB information, and other payer-specific requirements are accurate and up to date.
Step 4: Prepare Appeal Letter
Draft a professional, concise appeal letter outlining the denial reason, corrective actions taken, and supporting documentation.
Step 5: Submit Within Deadline
Adhere to the payer’s appeal timeline to avoid forfeiting the opportunity for reconsideration.
Step 6: Track and Follow Up
Monitor the appeal’s progress and follow up with the payer for updates. Use denial management tools like Adam to automate tracking and reporting.
Preventing CO-228 denials requires a proactive approach across the revenue cycle, from front-end processes to billing and technology implementation.
When denials do occur, Rachel (AI Appeals Manager) streamlines the appeals process, improving success rates and reducing turnaround time for appealed claims.
Q1: What does CO-228 mean in medical billing?
CO-228 refers to claims denied due to missing information requested by the primary payer for adjudication.
Q2: Can CO-228 denials be appealed?
Yes, with proper documentation and adherence to payer timelines, CO-228 denials can be successfully appealed.
Q3: How long do I have to appeal?
Appeal deadlines vary by payer. Review the explanation of benefits (EOB) or denial notice for specific timelines.
Q4: How can I prevent these denials?
Focus on eligibility verification, COB accuracy, and leveraging automated tools like Adam. See our complete guide on denial prevention.